There are two ways to label the Wilshire 5000 at the moment, both are similar so it’s a moot point at the moment.
My preferred take is here. This implies wave 5 of (5) needs to stretch it’s legs at a bit still.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5b2b/d5b2b3574935dc557e0e1aec72f7508003f0e2ca" alt=""
The other implies a more shortened course.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5238/a5238f0eb130af649e4e2badf6a68dc9c6ae99c3" alt=""
Possible squiggle count using option 2 subwaves.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3201/d320150acbab90dd0fcf8847a95b20131fa6bb72" alt=""